Agenda
Association of Commuter
Rail Employees' position regarding plans to reorganize the Metropolitan
Transportation Authority
About ACRE
The Association of
Commuter Rail Employees (ACRE) is headquartered at 420 Lexington Ave., Suite 215
in New York City. ACRE currently represents 1,500 transportation employees
including Conductors, Engineers, Rail Traffic Controllers, Power Supervisors,
Signalmen, Yardmasters and Hostlers on MTA/Metro-North Railroad. ACRE has been
certified in democratically conducted elections administered by the National
Mediation Board to collectively bargain for these crafts with the MTA/Metro-North
Railroad. ACRE won this right through elections conducted by the National
Mediation Board against the United Transportation Union, the Brotherhood of
Locomotive Engineers, and the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen by a combined
total of 1,085 to 179.
ACRE is the largest union
on MTA/Metro-North Railroad and it is the first railroad union in the country to
concentrate its services on the concerns of railroad employees in passenger
service. Every year ACRE members provide 72 million customers in the New York
and Connecticut metropolitan area with the safest and most reliable railroad
passenger service possible. ACRE recognizes its responsibility to achieve its
members' objectives through a cooperative effort with the MTA/Metro-North
Railroad, the New York and Connecticut State Legislatures, and the Riding Public
we all serve.
Metropolitan Transportation Authority Reorganization Plan
On October 9, 2002, the Chairman of the Metropolitan Transportation
Authority, Peter S. Kalikow, announced plans for a restructuring of the agency
designed to cut costs and improve service to its customers. Of immediate
interest to the Association of Commuter Rail Employees was the provision that
called for the merging of the two separate rail companies the MTA oversees,
Metro-North Railroad and the Long Island Rail Road, into one entity the MTA Rail
Road. The plan's proponents believe the restructuring proposal will ultimately
save millions of dollars by consolidating the accounting, managerial and
administration functions of the MTA. In the February 2005 report from New York
State Comptroller, Alan G. Hevesi, the DOB set a savings target of $210 million
dollars over three years although a detailed road map has not yet been
presented.
In the October 2002 news release, Chairman Kalikow stated, "No MTA collective
bargaining agreements will be unilaterally changed by the restructuring plans
... In
addition, union representation will continue to be determined by the wishes of
our employees." Chairman Kalikow's assurance and the fact that the Long Island
Rail Road and Metro-North Railroad each serve a different metropolitan region
and neither duplicate service nor operate over any of the same trackage, led our
organization to believe the reorganization proposal would have the smallest
impact on the ACRE represented workers who make up Operations Services on MTA/
Metro-North Railroad.
Actions in Washington however, took a different turn
with the introduction of HR 5764 in the 107th Congress and HR 308 in the 108th
Congress. These two bills sought to eliminate the collective bargaining
agreements of ACRE represented employees on MTA/MN and replace them with the
LIRR contracts covering ACRE represented crafts. Although both of these bills
died with the close of their respective legislative sessions, warning flags were
raised for ACRE representatives and their members.
To address our concerns, ACRE representatives have had ongoing discussions with
the MTA's Director of Labor Relations, Gary Delaverson, who has repeatedly
reiterated what Chairman Kalikow has expressed; that contract negotiations and
recognized union representation will not be affected by the MTA's reorganization
plans (copy of letter included). While ACRE is satisfied that the MTA has no
desire to alter the collective bargaining process or the representation
provisions contained in the Railway Labor Act, our organization recognizes that
there have been competing pieces of legislation in Albany concerning the MTA's
reorganization.
ACRE appreciates the
opportunity to meet with Corporations, Authorities and Commissions Chairman,
Richard L. Brodsky, Committee on Transportation member, Robert K. Sweeney, and
Assembly Majority Leader, Paul A. Tokasz, to discuss the legislative issues
surrounding the MTA's reorganization and ACRE's concerns.
ACRE's Position and Concerns
The Association of Commuter
Rail Employees fully supports any reorganization plan designed to promote
operational and administrative efficiencies while streamlining the MTA's
organization. ACRE is aware that the MTA has undergone many changes since its
inception and the public deserves increased transparency with regard to the
MTA's finances and operations.
ACRE's concerns are primarily
in the area of collective bargaining and union representation. The laws
governing collective bargaining and representation in the railroad industry are
clearly spelled out in the Railway Labor Act (RLA) and the National Mediation
Board is clearly recognized as the agency responsible for the administration of
its regulations. Furthermore, the RLA has established certain rights granted to
labor organizations in the area of collective bargaining and certain regulations
to which it must adhere. Over the years, both the Long Island Rail Road and
Metro-North Railroad have negotiated separate collective bargaining agreements
under the NMB's authority.
Just as the MTA is evolving to meet its administrative needs, the Long Island
Rail Road and Metro-North Railroad are two very different operations that have
evolved over the years to meet their needs. Because the service areas are very
different - geographical differences, travel patterns, political structure,
community structure, recreational infrastructure - the collective bargaining
agreements each railroad has negotiated over the years have likewise evolved to
serve the needs of their own unique service area. The LIRR has long stretches of
branch lines served by only one track and must manage choke points like Jamaica
station while operating without terminal work rules. MNRR on the other hand,
operates over three separate divisions in two states and must administer rush
hour operations originating from a variety of different terminals. Work rules
designed for specific needs on one railroad would only hinder the operation on
another railroad. That is why bargaining agreements are tailored during contract
negotiations.
For these reasons, ACRE wants to make very clear that any
legislation resulting in a reorganization of the MTA must include the same labor
protections that are provided by the National Mediation Board's administration
of the Railway Labor Act. These include the provisions covering the collective
bargaining process and the representational protections that cover the
certification of unions for the purposes of collective bargaining.
Finally, because seniority is the single most important personal protection
provided to ACRE members under the administration of our collective bargaining
agreements, ACRE would require language in any MTA reorganization plan to
clearly state that the seniority rosters already established for our represented
crafts will in no way be altered by any subsequent legislation. The legislation
must contain language that would preclude the dovetailing of seniority rosters
between active agreement employees of the LIRR and MNRR.
ACRE appreciates the opportunity you have afforded us to voice our opinions and
concerns and looks forward to working with all members of the New York State
Assembly and Senate on issues that effect the employees we represent.